The freedom to choose between Operating Systems (or places to eat or whatever) is a VERY good thing. Your talking about market choice, this is something completely different. And if you don’t like Vista, choose something else. Compared to now, it sucked a lot… Value the freedom to choose.
Figuratively speaking: one type of pants, one type of shoes, two types of beer, two types of bread, one type of bread-rolls, one type of butter… I lived in such a country, until the Velvet revolution happened. People complaining about too much choice should live, for a while, in a place with limited choice. And each combination makes sense for someone, so it’s good it’s there.
#Jungle screen saver mac how to
So there are 2 layers of choice – what to do, how to do it. Also, the Fn- shortcuts and display closing provide the same results, just in a different way. For one, the icons provided the same choice as the menu text entries. So choice, in restaurants, is good.Īctually, the article blew up the number of choices. And I also want the rest of the places be available, should I change my mind later, or should the quality of my preferred places drop. Taking every citizen into account, you get hundreds of cafes and restaurants in a city. 1.5*$FEW (average between no overlap and total overlap) just for the two of us. My “few” and your “few” don’t have to overlap. Yes, but _I_ want to choose _my_ $FEW restaurants and _you_ want choose _your_ $FEW places. If there are thousands of pubs/restaurants/cafes to go to, most people constrict their choices artificially to the few they get used to quickly, adding in and removing a few choices now and then. I am not advocating that every device should have every choice, just that there should be options and choices available to the consumer. Looking at it in this larger sense, you see that choices are necessary. I am equating the MP3 player market here to the UI in discussion.
Those that are “infuriated” at the iPod need to have choices and options available. Not necessarily that every iPod should have every choice option, but that the MP3 player market needs choices. You talk about iPods not meeting some people’s needs. They don’t go into which video card is installed. Most people I see just go into the store and buy one in their price range.
#Jungle screen saver mac software
Microsoft seems to be choosing the latter, despite being the most mainstream software maker there is. Either making 70-80% happy or 90% unhappy. That is why you need to CHOOSE which users you cater for. They are, however, the extreme minority and if you are making mainstream software it does not make sense making the average user very unhappy by the sheer complexity just so you can cater for these users. These users will also have hugely different wants and needs and catering to them will not just slightly increase complexity, it will multiply complexity many times over. These people will find the iPod infuriatingly simple and will hate “dumbing down” of interfaces. The exception to this rules are people that care SO MUCH about that particular niche that they love to customise something exactly to their needs. That too many choices makes people unhappy has been backed by scientific research. A good shop would do things to help me restrict the choice. It makes me unhappy to have to choose between all of these choices. The choice is confusing and sometimes downright infuriating.
There are currently hundreds of graphic card options from nVidia and ATI. People have to constrict their options in order to live happily in a big city. I have several analogies explaining this: Joel quotes research saying that too much choice IS bad.
0 kommentar(er)
